A halfway house in Los Angeles on Feb. 3, 2023. Photo by Larry Valenzuela, CalMatters/CatchLight Local
In summary
As the state moves to shrink its prison population, it hasn’t been measuring the effectiveness of a key parole program known as STOP, the Specialized Treatment for Optimized Programming.
The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is taking steps to begin measuring the efficiency and effectiveness of the parole programs central to the state’s efforts to shrink its prison population.
The move comes after a CalMatters investigation revealed the state had spent more than $600 million on the Specialized Treatment for Optimized Programming, but couldn’t say whether it helped participants. The Corrections Department did not collect data that would show how many participants found jobs or whether they went back to prison for another crime.
A request for proposals on the state’s procurement website says that the department has “received one-time funding to measure parole outcomes.”
“The department has implemented various educational and rehabilitation programs over the years to reduce recidivism rates and improve the reintegration of incarcerated individuals into society,” the request states. “The core objective of this Agreement is to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of these efforts in achieving the goals of reducing recidivism and improving offender outcomes.”
Launched in 2014, STOP has an annual budget of about $100 million and helps about 8,500 of the 35,000 inmates the state releases annually to get back on their feet and stay out of trouble. The department relies on four contractors to run the program, who in turn subcontract with nearly 200 private companies, community organizations and nonprofits.
In all, there are about 450 facilities statewide in the network. Some participants live in the facilities, others just visit outpatient centers. Participation is voluntary.
The CalMatters investigation, published in July, found that state officials rarely review the operations of the four companies that operate the program.
Records show state officials only documented reviews of three of the more than 400 state-funded reentry homes and treatment facilities from 2018 to December 2022. The state’s July 2022 list of reentry homes included several with suspended business licenses and nonprofit status revoked years ago by the California Department of Justice — effectively barring them from doing business in California.
The department’s request for proposals is for the creation of a data warehouse and data visualization tools. The maximum amount of the contract is set to be $4.5 million, according to the RFP. The contract is expected to begin in June and last for two years.
Andrew Donohue is the investigative editor at CalMatters. Previously, he served as executive editor of projects at Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, where he helped lead digital, audio... More by Andrew Donohue
Republish
We investigated California’s rehab for parolees. Now, the state is taking action
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
Do not edit the article, including the headline,except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Gift this article
California to assess effectiveness of parole programs - CalMatters
California parole programs will now be measured for their efficiency and effectiveness.
CalMatters
California, explained
Andrew Donohue
Andrew Donohue is the investigative editor at CalMatters. Previously, he served as executive editor of projects at Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, where he helped lead digital, audio and video projects that forced major change, including Rape on the Night Shift, Amazon: Behind the Smiles, All Work. No Pay. and Reveal’s immigration reporting. He worked on teams that were twice named Pulitzer Prize finalists and won Investigative Reporters and Editors, Edward R. Murrow and Online News Association awards, among others. Before that he was the editor of Voice of San Diego, a pioneering local news nonprofit. Other languages spoken: Spanish (fluent)