A four-photo collage shows different moments from people’s lives: a couple sitting outdoors with a gift box, an older person smiling in a restaurant, a black-and-white portrait of someone seated at a desk, and an older person posing beside a fireplace with framed art and decorative objects.
Clients of Ventura County conservator Angelique Friend. Photos courtesy of family members

Twenty years ago, state lawmakers created the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau after a series by the Los Angeles Times exposed self-dealing and a failure of judges to stop it.

In a new project, CalMatters investigative reporter Byrhonda Lyons reveals how the bureau allows conflicts of interest to continue for years with little consequence. 

To tell the story, Byrhonda dug deep into the arrangements of Angelique Friend, a court-appointed conservator in Ventura County. It’s her job to take care of the lives and finances of elderly people deemed too ill to care for themselves.

Court rules discourage conflicts of interest, real or perceived. The bureau’s rules explicitly forbid them. 

But for years, Friend hired her husband as her attorney and his in-home health care company to provide her clients’ care. 

Friend’s elderly clients often footed the bill for all three services until they could no longer afford or use in-home health care. Then, with the court’s approval, Friend moved them to less-expensive care facilities and sold their homes, court records show. 

For years, Friend and her husband often disclosed their connections to the court, and Judge Roger Lund approved the payments. 

Court records show the couple brought in about $3 million from 2019 to 2025 from clients in the six cases CalMatters reviewed; $2.7 million went to her husband’s health care company. 

Families of the conservatees often raised their concerns with the court and filed complaints with the bureau, to no avail. 

  • Carole Herman, an advocate who filed a complaint to the bureau on behalf of one family: “I am totally disappointed and devastated because I worked really hard to get that bureau started, and they have no teeth.”

But there has been some movement after CalMatters began asking Ventura County court officials questions. Judge Lund was reassigned to a different court. The new judge handling Friend’s cases has already expressed skepticism that he could approve the arrangement with her husband, citing the court’s rules on conflicts.

Help us continue reporting: Let us know if you have had an experience with a fiduciary or conservator you would like to share. 


CalMatters recognition: CalMatters is a finalist in the National Magazine Awards, one of the most prestigious awards in journalism, for investigative reporter Anat Rubin’s story, “The Man Who Unsolved a Murder.” CalMatters is nominated in the public interest category. The investigation is cited in the analysis of a state bill that would significantly increase defense investigations and create minimum standards statewide. Winners will be announced in May.

More recognition: CalMatters’ political accountability journalism, powered by its groundbreaking Digital Democracy database, is a finalist for the Toner Prize for Excellence in Local Political Reporting. The Toner Prizes highlight and reinforce quality, fact-based political reporting — work that illuminates the electoral process, reveals the politics of policy and engages the public in democracy.



Supreme Court issues ruling on transgender status and schools

A person stands in front of a large neoclassical government building with tall columns, holding a small rainbow flag overhead. They wear a shirt that reads “Proud Parent of a Trans Kid.” A few people and security personnel are visible in the background near the steps.
A transgender rights supporter takes part in a rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington D.C. on Dec. 4, 2024. Photo by Kevin Dietsch, Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow to members of the LGBTQ community after it granted an emergency appeal to temporarily block a California law banning school districts from adopting policies requiring school staff to out transgender students to their parents.

After California passed the contentious law in 2024, educators and parents sued the state, arguing in part that the legislation violates their religious beliefs. A federal judge sided with the plaintiffs in December, and on Monday at least five justices from the conservative-leaning high court agreed.

  • The ruling: “The parents who assert a free exercise claim have sincere religious beliefs about sex and gender, and they feel a religious obligation to raise their children in accordance with those beliefs. California’s policies violate those beliefs…”

Corrin Rankin, the chairperson of the California Republican Party, praised the decision, saying in a statement that parents have a right to know “if a school is making life-changing decisions about your child.”

Newsom threatens counties over CARE Court

A group of officials stands inside a building under construction with exposed wooden framing. One person speaks at a podium with a sign that reads “TREATMENT NOT TENTS,” while others stand behind them listening. Temporary work lights hang overhead, and unfinished walls and beams fill the background.
Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Hayward on March 2, 2026. Photo by Manuel Orbegozo for CalMatters

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday threatened to pull funding from counties that he argues are not adequately implementing CARE Court — one of his signature programs that launched statewide in 2024 to help move people with severe mental illness off the streets. 

At a press conference in Hayward, the governor cited 10 counties he said are underperforming, including Los Angeles, Orange, San Francisco and Santa Clara, writes CalMatters’ Marisa Kendall. Though Newsom said he would be “happy to redirect every damn penny … to the counties that are getting things done,” he did not specify which funding would be at risk. 

A CalMatters investigation found that CARE Court has helped far fewer than the 12,000 Californians the Newsom administration initially estimated would qualify. Through January, judges have approved just 893 treatment agreements. Some family members who sought help for their loved ones have also reported being disappointed with the program.

Read more.

And lastly: That stair report finally came in

An outdoor opening of a brick building that leads to a flight of stairs in between apartment units.
A staircase in an apartment building. Photo via iStock

As we wrote about before, the state-ordered report on staircases was tardy. But it’s here now! Read more from CalMatters’ Ben Christopher.



Other things worth your time:

Some stories may require a subscription to read.


Voter ID appears headed for CA’s November ballot. What you should know // Los Angeles Times

The push for 875K people to help get CA billionaire tax on the ballot // The Wall Street Journal

Here’s how economists say CA could tax billionaires — without losing them to TX // San Francisco Chronicle

Car insurance rates are skyrocketing in CA. Here’s why // Los Angeles Times

What’s considered a living wage in CA? How much you need to make in 2026 // The Sacramento Bee

SF’s legal resistance takes on ICE detentions // The San Francisco Standard

Thousands brace for fallout from unreported LA County criminal convictions // Los Angeles Daily News

Defense Department tells San Diego military bases to remain on alert for attacks // The San Diego Union-Tribune

Lynn La is the newsletter writer for CalMatters, focusing on California’s top political, policy and Capitol stories every weekday. She produces and curates WhatMatters, CalMatters’ flagship daily newsletter...