A person wearing a navy suit points to a monitor with a line chart on it during a press conference. The California state seal, state flag and the American flag can be seen behind them.
Gov. Gavin Newsom during a press conference unveiling his revised 2025-26 budget proposal at the Capitol Annex Swing Space in Sacramento on May 14, 2025. Photo by Fred Greaves for CalMatters

Former Gov. Jerry Brown left office eight years ago with a big surplus and an ominous message in his last state budget: “What’s out there is darkness, uncertainty, decline and recession, so ‘Good luck, baby.’” 

Today Gov. Gavin Newsom is scheduled to present his final state spending plan and he’ll do it with a cloudy crystal ball. 

On the one hand, California’s state finances are flush from the booming stock market and the thriving artificial intelligence companies driving the Bay Area’s economy. Those companies are a gift that keeps on giving to the state budget, especially with an initial public offering just over the horizon for ChatGPT-maker Open AI.

On the other, the Trump administration’s priorities are at odds with Newsom’s, and decisions coming out of the White House are costing California billions of dollars in revenue that was expected for healthcare.

Then there’s the war in Iran, which threatens to trigger a global recession as the stalemate in the Strait of Hormuz continues.

Newsom in January projected a “modest shortfall” of $2.9 billion next year that would grow to a $22 billion deficit in fiscal year 2027-28.

But since then the picture has become a bit rosier. California Assembly budget guru Jason Sisney has noted that income tax collections are coming almost $11 billion over what Newsom anticipated five months ago.

The Legislative Analyst’s Office also revised its revenue forecast, finding the state is likely to collect about $25 billion more over a three-year budgeting window than previously projected.

How much will Newsom want to spend and how much will he sock away to cushion what may come for his successor? We’ll find out today. Check back at CalMatters.org for updates. Our Yue Stella Yu will be anchoring coverage. 

Speaking of state spending: California climate regulators are proposing to change the state’s carbon market in ways that could cut revenues in half — leaving no funding at all for safe drinking water, fire resilience and other programs. Read more from CalMatters’ Rachel Becker.


The Ideas Festival agenda is set and it’s packed. Hear from The Lincoln Project founders, Janet Napolitano, Julian Castro, Dan Walters and more. Join us in Sacramento on May 21 for a day of big ideas, smart conversations and connection. Get your tickets today.

We’re bringing our voter guide to life through VotingMatters events across California this month, in collaboration with on-the-ground partners: Local news organizations, colleges, libraries, churches and nonprofit organizations. Our next events are tonight in Bakersfield and Friday evening in Riverside. Plus, we have a DIY kit to host your own event. 



New rules for plastics recycling

Food items delivered during a food distribution at Interfaith Community Services in Escondido on Oct. 30, 2025. Photo by Ariana Drehsler for CalMatters

California just finished writing new rules for plastics recycling that demand more from manufacturers and less from consumers. They’re among the toughest regulations in the country. And while it’s no surprise that plastic producers are pushing back against the regulations, why are environmental groups threatening to sue over them?

As CalMatters’ Alejandra Reyes-Velarde explains, plastic producers will be required by 2032 to make all their packaging recyclable or compostable. They’ll also have to pay $5 billion over a decade for the environmental damage their products have caused to communities.

But the rules also allow some materials with unique technical challenges, as well as plastic that federal law requires for food safety, to apply for exemptions. It also allows certain waste polluting technologies to count as recycling, as long as companies have a hazardous waste permit.

Because of these exemptions, two environmental groups — the Natural Resources Defense Council and Californians Against Waste — said they plan to take California to court.

  • Nick Lapis, director of advocacy for Californians Against Waste, in a statement: “These regulations … create permanent escape hatches the law never authorized.”

Read more.

Delayed ‘point in time’ report

Small bike path lights illuminate two people leaning down as one of them hands a ziplock bag of toiletry items to a person sitting next to a bike with their head leaning forward.
Volunteers survey an unhoused person near State Route 15 as they conduct the annual point-in-time count in San Diego on Jan. 29, 2026. Photo by Adriana Heldiz, CalMatters

The federal report that pulls together each state’s “point-in-time count” on homelessness provides a critical snapshot of the number of unhoused people nationwide. But there’s one big problem with the latest report, writes CalMatters’ Marisa Kendall: The feds haven’t released it.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development requires cities, counties and states to count their homeless populations every other year. Each region must submit their count to HUD by the spring. HUD then verifies the data, tallies the total count and submits a public report to Congress — which typically happens in December.

But it’s been five months and there hasn’t been a peep from HUD. 

  • Jesse Rabinowitz, spokesperson for the National Homelessness Law Center: “This is, by what I can tell, the latest any point-in-time count has ever come out, including the years where it was delayed during COVID.”

The report guides how homelessness funding is allocated, shapes policy decisions and provides state-by-state comparisons. Though California has tallied its own data, its analysis doesn’t include information including race, age and mental health status like the official federal report. 

Read more.

And lastly: Clashes over changing county charter

Afternoon light illuminates a metal frame inside a building with the photos of five elected officials and a diagram of the building itself.
Photos of the current San Diego Board of Supervisors are displayed inside the San Diego County Administration Center on March 24, 2026. Photo by Adriana Heldiz, CalMatters

San Diego County leaders want to update the county’s charter to make the local government run more efficiently. But not everyone is in agreement: While one county board member wants to give supervisors longer term limits and more say over senior staff, another is labeling the proposal “a rushed power grab.” Read more from CalMatters’ Deborah Brennan.



Other things worth your time:

Some stories may require a subscription to read.


Federal government to defer $1.3B to CA Medicaid says VP Vance // The Sacramento Bee

Trump and Kennedy seek to relax safeguards for AI healthcare tools // KFF Health News

Tom Steyer’s hedge fund past complicates his run as CA’s anti-billionaire billionaire // The Mercury News

A bombshell fraud case takes the spotlight in CA’s high-stakes race for governor // Los Angeles Times

AI companies are poised to go public. CA’s hoping to get rich // Politico

Solar developers say state program is a mess and slow to help low-income households // LAist

SF Mayor Lurie promised a permitting overhaul. Its builders say it was troubled from the start // The San Francisco Standard

Hundreds of late ballots in the Valley were not counted last year, data analysis finds // KVPR

Residents fear a backlash after mayor accused of working with China // Los Angeles Times

Lynn La is the newsletter writer for CalMatters, focusing on California’s top political, policy and Capitol stories every weekday. She produces and curates WhatMatters, CalMatters’ flagship daily newsletter...