Tempers are still hot after the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. Photo by Mobilus in Mobili via Flickr
In summary
What will be the California repercussions from the U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings of Brett Kavanaugh? We asked the insiders.
If progressives can find a silver lining in the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh—and as they now contemplate a conservative majority on the country’s highest court for years, if not decades, to come, it’s a vanishingly thin one—it’s on the odd chance that this whole catastrophe will ultimately turnout out more enraged Democratic voters in the November election.
We put the question to politicos around California. Many thought the Democrats can expect to reap an electoral reward, but even more believed it won’t make much of a difference.
In the latest the California Target Book Insider Track Survey of campaign consultants, lobbyists and other legislative operatives, a slim majority of the 34 politicos surveyed predict no major “Kavanaugh effect” on either major party’s political fortunes.
A quarter of respondents said they expect the confirmation battle would have no effect, while another quarter says both Republicans and Democrats will see boosts in turnout, resulting in a wash.
Of the remaining respondents, 44 percent said Democrats would largely benefit from higher turnout. Only 5 percent said Republicans would reap the largest political return. (They were responding last week, after the hearings but before national polls of likely voters indicated an immediate “Brett bump” for Republicans that may or may not dissipate by the midterms.)
But even if the Democratic Party as a whole isn’t likely to see an effect one way or another, Sen. Dianne Feinstein likely came away from the hearings worse for wear, the survey respondents said.
As the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee and an early recipient of Palo Alto professor Christine Blasey Ford’s letter, Feinstein took political flak from the right and the left throughout the confirmation process. President Trump mocked her for being simultaneously conniving and feeble, while her opponent in the U.S. Senate race, state Sen. Kevin de León, said she should have made the letter public earlier. (Ford herself has said that she is satisfied with the way that Feinstein handled the situation).
Over half of respondents guessed that any California who watched the confirmation hearing will have come away with a negative impression of the sitting senator, with 41 percent saying she will lose appeal among Republican voters and 12 percent saying that voters will see her as “old and out of touch.” Another 38 percent said that she will leave a more positive impression: as a “strong, determined leader,” as someone who represents the Democratic base, or both.
Whatever impression she leaves, Feinstein likely remains the heavy favorite in her race against de León. A Public Policy Institute of California poll found Feinstein leading him among likely voters, 40-to-29 percent. But that survey was conducted before Kavanaugh was confirmed.
Ben Christopher covers housing policy for CalMatters. His favorite reporting assignment so far: Touring the various two- and three-story structures that have sprouted up across San Diego under the regulatory... More by Ben Christopher
Republish
Political insiders: Don’t expect a major “Kavanaugh effect” in California midterms
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
Do not edit the article, including the headline,except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Gift this article
Political insiders: Don't expect a major "Kavanaugh effect" in California midterms - CalMatters
What will be the California repercussions from the U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings of Brett Kavanaugh? We asked the insiders.
CalMatters
California, explained
Ben Christopher
Ben Christopher covers housing policy for CalMatters. His favorite reporting assignment so far: Touring the various two- and three-story structures that have sprouted up across San Diego under the regulatory guise of “accessory dwelling units” thanks to that city’s one-of-a-kind program. Prior to taking over the housing beat in the spring of 2023, Ben wrote about elections and politics for CalMatters, covering four election cycles, including the 2021 gubernatorial recall campaign. Ben has a past life as an aspiring beancounter: He has worked as a summer associate at the Congressional Budget Office and has a Master’s in Public Policy from the University of California, Berkeley. He lives in Oakland where he enjoys riding his bike, baking (and then eating) pies and working on his repertoire of dad jokes.