Republish
Nursing home funding cut in a budget-surplus year is unconscionable
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

Nursing home funding cut in a budget-surplus year is unconscionable
Share this:
By Craig Cornett, Special to CalMatters
Craig Cornett is the CEO and president of the California Association of Health Facilities.
The governor’s proposed state budget would cut $275 million from Medi-Cal payments to California’s skilled nursing facility operators, pushing financially vulnerable nursing homes to the brink of closure.
Unlike other health care providers, skilled nursing facilities are nearly 100% government funded, with Medi-Cal funding care for two-thirds of the residents and Medicare paying the rest. These public funds don’t cover the cost of care, however.
Gov. Gavin Newsom’s proposed state budget cuts base funding and leaves these facilities no way to make up the loss.
As inflation has risen during the last several years, nursing home operating costs have increased significantly, further widening the gap between costs and public funding revenues. At the same time, California has a record budget surplus.
It is stunning that the state government would choose to cut its investment in skilled nursing facilities that provide care to its most vulnerable residents. If the budget proposal is adopted, skilled nursing facility owners would face the last option they would want to consider — cutting wages during an unprecedented worker shortage.
Skilled nursing facilities provide 24-hour care to residents, who typically are elderly, disabled, chronically ill individuals who need medical assistance and attention on an extended basis. After two years of paying for increased protections against COVID-19, dealing with double-digit inflation and providing higher wages for our health care workers, the proposed state funding cuts would be a devastating blow to these facilities, their patients and staff.
The budget proposal does include some well-intentioned new quality incentive programs. However, no nursing home operator can pay base wages from potential incentive awards.
The proposed funding reduction likely will result in:
The California Association of Health Facilities strongly opposes the proposed $275 million cut in funding for our sector.
We urge the Newsom administration and legislators to work with us to develop an alternative funding proposal — one that will protect our base rate, support operators and our employees in this inflationary environment, and preserve access to skilled nursing care for California’s most vulnerable citizens.
We encourage the public to let their elected representatives and the governor know they should not cut funding to skilled nursing homes — a critical part of our state’s health care system.