In summary
California farmworkers marched 335 miles last year to pressure Gov. Gavin Newsom on a law that would help them unionize. Then the union agreed to give back a key win.
Lea este artículo en español.
This story has been updated to reflect the latest progress on the farmworker unionization bill.
A new law expanding rights for California farmworkers seeking to unionize went into effect in January, but it’s already scheduled for some major revisions.
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB 2183 in September last year, which significantly changed the way the state’s farmworkers can vote to unionize by allowing farmworkers to vote by mail or by signing union authorization cards. Now a compromise may claw back some of the union’s gains.
The law drew intense criticism from growers and the agricultural industry, while the United Farm Workers labor union garnered public support for the measure with a 335-mile march to Sacramento. National attention and pressure for Newsom to sign the measure peaked with a public statement of support from President Joe Biden.
Newsom reluctantly signed the bill— but with the caveat that during the current legislative year there would be compromises enacted to change the law. Labor leaders signed a letter agreeing to the changes.
The law went into effect on Jan. 1. On May 4 the state Senate and Assembly approved a bill containing the agreed-upon changes, despite continued objections by grower lobbyists who said they were not consulted on the compromise and don’t agree with the new terms.
Neither union officials nor the governor’s office would comment on their objections.
“The governor looks forward to signing the agreed upon amendments strengthening implementation and voting integrity in last year’s legislation expanding union rights for farmworkers,” said Omar Rodriguez, a spokesperson for Newsom’s office.
How farmworkers unionized
California farmworkers previously were able to vote for unions by filling out secret ballots in person, usually on their employer’s property.
It was a two-step process. A majority of farmworkers at a worksite or company would first call for a union election by petitioning the Agricultural Labor Relations Board and notifying the employer. Then they would hold an in-person secret ballot, often at the worksite.
If a majority voted to unionize, the employer had to recognize the union.
Labor advocates say this process poses significant barriers for farmworker unionization, as many workers fear employer retaliation.
More than half of California’s farmworkers are undocumented. Also a 2021 Supreme Court decision put limits on union organizers’ access to growers’ property.
Farmworkers are not covered by the union protections afforded most other workers under the National Labor Relations Act. California’s agricultural workers didn’t gain the right to unionize until 1975, when Gov. Jerry Brown signed the Agricultural Labor Relations Act, after years of United Farm Workers activism to improve work conditions.
Union membership among farmworkers and the UFW’s power have since waned.
At the height of the UFW’s power in the 1970s, it had roughly 150 contracts and 80,000 members in California, Texas, Arizona and Florida.
By the end of 2021, the UFW’s contract count had fallen as low as 31 nationwide, and a federal report showed membership at 5,512. But union leadership said that is a substantial undercount that was done in late December, when many farmworkers don’t work.
UC Merced estimated in 2021 that farmworker union membership had fallen to a statistical 0%. More recently the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported 3.9% union membership in agriculture and related industries.
What changes with AB 2183
With the new law agricultural employees have two options to unionize.
Farmworkers can vote with mail-in ballots in an election process, but growers must agree to maintain neutrality. Or, if growers don’t agree to maintain neutrality, farmworkers can vote via “card check,” a simpler process allowing employees to sign cards to show their union support.
The Agricultural Labor Relations Board handles these union petitions. The board said in its January budget request it has conducted six elections since fiscal year 2016-17. The agency asked for $1.1 million in the budget request, citing possible increases in unionizing activity because of the new law.
“This will also significantly increase the number of election objections and unfair labor practice charges that will be filed,” the agency wrote.
The new funds would pay to hire three attorneys and three field examiners in the Salinas, Oxnard and Visalia field offices. They would be responsible for conducting elections, investigating unfair labor practices and prosecuting unfair election activity and bargaining violations.
The board warned it would be unable to meet “stringent” timelines imposed by the new law without the funds.
Persistent opposition
Grower groups vehemently opposed farmworkers voting by mail and argued against removing the secret ballot process, saying it would allow too many opportunities for fraud while placing too much power in unions’ hands.
“What that’s really doing, at the end of the day, is getting around the whole secret ballot election process,” said Matthew Allen, vice president of government relations at the Western Growers Association.
Newsom has said he was reluctant to sign the new law due to concerns about privacy and the security of the new ballot process. He eventually signed it, after vetoing similar legislation in the past, on the condition that several parts would be amended and clarified during this legislative session.
The most significant condition in the compromise calls for completely removing the law’s mail-in voting process. Instead farmworkers would only vote via the one-step card-check process.
The changes, which the UFW agreed to, also would cap the number of new unions organizing via card check at 75 in total, until the bill expires in 2028.
With these changes pending, it was unclear how much organizing the UFW would attempt under the current regulations.
The most significant condition calls for completely removing the law’s mail-in voting process. Instead farmworkers would only vote via the one-step card-check process.
Antonio De Loera-Brust, a UFW spokesperson, said in March that union leadership planned to honor their agreement with the governor, though he wouldn’t comment on the UFW’s organizing plans.
“We want this done as soon as possible,” he said.
After the deadline for filing new bills passed, the agreed-upon changes to the new law became part of one of the 2,600 bills that had already been introduced this session.
Traditionally much of the agricultural industry opposes unionization, usually citing already rising labor costs. Promised changes to the new law, including eliminating mail-in voting, have not altered that.
Allen, of the Western Growers, said he disagrees with implementing card check, regardless of the compromise changes. He said removing the secret ballot process is “forcing” farmworkers into unionization.
“We weren’t consulted on that, and we remain heavily opposed to this,” Allen said.
De Loera-Brust, on the other hand, said the new voting rules are not a “silver bullet” for unions. Barriers remain to organizing farmworkers, who often are isolated and scattered across rural areas, underpaid, and concerned about their jobs and immigration status.
“What this does is give workers a fighting chance,” he said.
more on the california divide
In familiar refrain, United Farm Workers grapples with how to grow
United Farm Workers membership has been down for years, so low that UC Merced researchers declared farmworker union membership statistically zero for 2020. Supporters say it’s too early to write the union’s obituary but UFW struggles to push its political agenda and grow its ranks.
California farmworkers cope with wildfire smoke, pesticides, roaches and rodents, survey says
A major UC Merced study and survey detail the harsh conditions many of California’s farmworkers experience at home and work. The issues are under a spotlight following the recent mass shootings at two mushroom farms.
