Republish
California cities lose money and harm citizens with ‘poverty tows.’ Why keep pursuing them?
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
California cities lose money and harm citizens with ‘poverty tows.’ Why keep pursuing them?
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Ted Mermin
Ted Mermin is the executive director of the Center for Consumer Law and Economic Justice at the UC Berkeley School of Law. He previously served as a deputy attorney general of California.
In California, if you don’t have enough money to pay for parking tickets, the government may take your car. I know – it’s true.
Every year, tens of thousands of low-income Californians lose their vehicles simply because they cannot afford to pay for parking tickets. City governments tow the cars not because they are currently parked illegally but because their owners haven’t paid past parking fines. The vehicles then run up storage fees at towing facilities – fees that low-income vehicle owners also cannot pay.
As a result, the cars are auctioned off. The outcome is that our cities are not only punishing people for being poor, but also taking away their lifeline for climbing out of poverty.
That is not the way California’s cities should be treating their most economically vulnerable residents. Losing a car can cost individuals their job, their medical care, their childcare and even their personal safety.
Many cities require vehicle owners to pay all their parking ticket debt, snowballing late fees and towing fees before allowing them to retrieve their impounded vehicle from the tow yard. But people who already couldn’t afford to pay their original parking tickets aren’t going to be able to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars in additional charges. In many cases, getting their car back from the tow yard would cost more than the car is worth.
As a result, their vehicles are sold out from under them at sham auctions for cents on the dollar – permanently depriving people of their access to transportation and digging them into an even deeper economic hole.
Absurdly, so-called poverty tows don’t even provide revenue to the cities that implement them. For example, a recent audit of San Diego’s towing practices found that the average sale price of a vehicle towed for unpaid parking tickets was $526. But towing and storage fees alone averaged $1,174. So, on average, the city of San Diego loses money each time it tows a legally parked car for unpaid tickets.
For 2023, the audit estimated that the city will lose over $300,000 on auction sales alone.
Towing cars this way violates the constitutions of both the United States and California. Just last month, a California appellate court ruled that towing legally parked cars solely because the owners have unpaid parking tickets is not only unrelated to public safety but also violates the California Constitution and the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable seizures.
Still, cities continue to seize people’s cars.
This lose-lose practice that benefits neither cities nor residents, while allowing tow yards to pocket excessive storage fees, needs to end.
Fortunately, a solution is within reach. Assembly Bill 1082, introduced by Assemblymember Ash Kalra of San Jose, would prohibit towing or immobilizing a vehicle solely because of unpaid parking tickets. It would also increase the number of tickets someone can receive before a hold is placed on their registration, which will help drivers keep their vehicles on the road. In addition, the bill establishes fair and reasonable payment plans so people can pay off their debt while retaining their car, ensuring that their economic lives are not upended.
If it passes, AB 1082 will end a practice that should have never been allowed in the first place, providing a measure of justice and relief to some of the state’s most financially fragile residents. And it will be further evidence that trying to fund local government on the backs of the poor is a fool’s errand.