Republish
California wasn’t a slave state, but its legacy shaped our laws. An apology is a crucial step for healing
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
California wasn’t a slave state, but its legacy shaped our laws. An apology is a crucial step for healing
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Reggie Jones-Sawyer
Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer, a Los Angeles Democrat, represents California’s 57th District. He served on the California Reparations Task Force.
California has a rich and complex history. With that, comes a responsibility to acknowledge and address the painful legacy of slavery.
Even though California was accepted into the union as a free state, it had a significant role in perpetuating racial discrimination and inequality. The way we treated Black Californians over the ensuing decades was derived directly from Jim Crow laws and slave-holding southern states.
For those that argue the absurd dogma that California was not a slave state, it was in many ways. California didn’t need plantations to institute discriminatory laws and practices targeting Black Californians. It denied basic rights and opportunities to entire generations.
These racist laws persisted long after slavery officially ended, as is evident by the segregation, exclusion and violence endured by Black California since the state’s inception in 1850.
The evidence is laid out in the California Reparations Task Force’s historic final report, which was written by serious academics and scholars, and whose use of historical and empirical data outlined the case for reparations. This must first start with an apology for the harms caused to Black Californians.
We do not need to delve that far into history to see the discriminatory laws that were put into place to keep Black communities from accessing housing, education and employment. While redlining, the practice by financial institutions to designate certain neighborhoods as unviable or prevent people from obtaining home loans in certain areas, formally ended in 1967, it persisted well into the 1990s.
An official apology from the state of California represents a crucial step toward reconciliation and healing. Assembly Bill 3089, which passed the Assembly last month, would require it.
Learn more about legislators mentioned in this story.
Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer
Democrat, Former State Assembly, District 57 (Los Angeles)
Rectifying historical injustices and fostering a more inclusive society should be our goal, but this can only begin if we admit to the sins of our past. Doing so will help to remind us that we must continue to work on dismantling systemic racism and promoting equity.
California’s apology for accepting slave laws into its core legal, judicial and law enforcement practices is not just about the past – it is about shaping a better future.
Read More
‘Just the beginning’: California reparations backers applaud bills, even without big cash payouts
What to know about California reparations: Is the state’s apology the beginning or the end?