Republish
I’ve applied for 736 jobs in California and have no takers. Is this the future of work?
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
-
- Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
-
- Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
-
- Do not edit the article, including the headline, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
-
- If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
-
- Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
-
- Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
-
- Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.

I’ve applied for 736 jobs in California and have no takers. Is this the future of work?
Share this:
Guest Commentary written by
Misty McAfee
Misty McAfee is a Los Angeles marketing strategist and writer.
In the past seven months, I’ve applied for 736 jobs. And I don’t know how I’m making rent in June.
I’m 55; I’ve worked since I was 14. I raised a son who graduated from a UC school. I paid taxes for four decades. I spent more than 20 years building a career in marketing, communications, events and brand strategy in California.
I’ve been using artificial intelligence tools since before most people knew what to call them. I integrated AI into workflows, marketing strategy, research and communications work because I believed staying current was the price of staying employed.
This is the part that’s hard to explain to people who haven’t lived it. I’ve revised my resume countless times. I’ve optimized LinkedIn. I’ve researched applicant tracking systems. I’ve networked and tailored every application.
The advice is endless and always about what I should do differently: Have you updated your LinkedIn? Have you reached out to your network? Have you tried applying to smaller companies?
Nobody stops and says: “Wait. We’re the fourth largest economy in the world and this is happening to someone who worked for 40 years and paid taxes and did everything they thought was correct.” The conversation never gets that far.
The dominant public narrative around unemployment still assumes a personal failure of adaptation. If someone can’t find work, the assumption is that they failed to evolve, failed to learn, failed to stay current. That story is convenient because it locates the problem in the individual and keeps it there.
I’m the worker the story said would be fine. I’m far from fine.
I started by applying for six-figure director level roles. When those didn’t land, I moved to manager positions. Then coordinator positions. Then hospitality work. Then catering jobs at hotels. The result across seven months and 736 applications was one Zoom interview.
Applications vanish into automated systems. Any sign of a human being on the other end has disappeared. Jobs are reposted after you’ve already applied. After months of applying, many postings begin to feel less like opportunities and more like data collection systems.
Meanwhile, California’s economic messaging stays relentlessly triumphant. Gov. Gavin Newsom boasts that California’s gross domestic product has grown to $4.25 trillion. Nvidia became the first company to surpass a $4 trillion market valuation, generating more than $2 million in profits per employee. And investment in AI reached more than $200 billion in 2025, up sharply from the year prior.
At the same time, more than 118,000 tech jobs were eliminated nationwide in 2025. California accounted for more than half of those losses. The companies cutting those positions cited AI as a primary cause.
What’s less clear is what happens to the workers being replaced along the way. I still believe I’ll work again. I still apply every day.
Before writing publicly about any of this, I sent an email to Newsom, gubernatorial candidate Katie Porter, Rep. Ted Lieu, Rep. Ro Khanna, and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. I told them exactly what I’m telling you. I asked them one question: What’s the plan?
Only Bass’s team responded. They sent an automated email with a list of employment resources. I clicked the link. The page said, “Error, not found.”
READ NEXT
Even California’s iconic industries are cutting back in this sluggish economy
California tax revenue getting a boost from AI boom — but for how long?