The Salton Sea at Bombay Beach on Feb. 4, 2023. Photo by Ariana Drehsler for CalMatters
In summary
Social and environmental groups sued last year saying the $1.8 billion Hell’s Kitchen project could cause water and air problems not disclosed in its environmental impact report. A judge disagreed.
An Imperial County judge cleared the way for the Hell’s Kitchen project, one of the world’s largest lithium mines, when he recently dismissed a lawsuit filed by civic and environmental groups.
Hell’s Kitchen, in the Salton Sea, promises to unearth a motherlode of lithium, a mineral essential to electric car batteries, cellphones and other electronics. While the court decision is expected to open a floodgate for U.S. lithium production, it has disappointed community organizers who worry the mine will endanger nearby residents.
The nonprofits Comite Civico del Valle and Earthworks argued in their lawsuit that the environmental review for Hell’s Kitchen did not fully address the project’s effects on water supply and air quality, and that the company developing it, Controlled Thermal Resources, didn’t consult with local Native American tribes as required by law. On Jan. 9 Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Jones ruled that Controlled Thermal Resources had met those requirements, freeing it to resume construction.
Opponents said that decision greenlights the project without sufficient environmental protection and community input.
“A just transition to renewable energy requires that we don’t create new sacrifice zones for
lithium mining,” Jared Naimark, California mining organizer with Earthworks, said in a statement.
Rodney Colwell, CEO of Controlled Thermal Resources, said he is pleased with the decision and expects to start construction in five to six months. However, the lawsuit set the project back a year or more.
“We’re happy to get past it, but it has cost us a lot of time and it has put the project at risk,” he said. “We haven’t been able to raise capital. We haven’t been able to move forward with development at all.”
Now that it’s back on track, Colwell said the company expects to start generating geothermal energy by the end of 2026 and mining lithium after that.
California leaders are determined to transition the public to electric vehicles over the next decade as part of the state’s battle against climate change. To do that, they’ll need lots of lithium.
That’s where the Salton Sea and Hell’s Kitchen come in. Energy companies are already producing geothermal energy at the site, extracting hot, high-pressure brine to generate electricity. The brine is rich with minerals, including more than 3,400 kilotons of lithium: enough to make over 375 million electric vehicle batteries, according to the Department of Energy. Hell’s Kitchen will remove minerals from the brine and then reinject it into aquifers around the Salton Sea.
State and federal officials gushed about the prospect of that much domestic lithium, predicting that the area they call “Lithium Valley” could become one of the world’s biggest sources of the “white gold,” freeing the U.S. from depending on other countries for the critical mineral.
“The development in Imperial Valley is a gamechanger for not just Southern California but the entire nation in shifting lithium dependence on foreign countries to a domestic supply,” Controlled Thermal Resources stated in a press release.
But local organizers and academics raised a red flag, pointing to uncertainty about the extraction process and possible pollution.
“The direct lithium extraction technology that the Hell’s Kitchen Lithium Project plans to deploy has only been tested at a demonstration level, and their Imperial County project would be one of the first commercial plants of this scale in the United States,” said Luis Olmedo, Executive Director for Comite Civico del Valle, in a statement.
“It’s got a lot of unknowns in terms of air quality,” added James Blair, a geography professor at Cal Poly Pomona who published research on the project. “This is already a degraded region, not only from the impacts of agriculture, but also the receding Salton Sea itself.”
Blair told CalMatters the environmental review is fuzzy about how much toxic dust the mine would produce, how much water is needed to dilute the brine and whether the mining process would release harmful substances such as hydrogen sulfide or radon.
“The Hell’s Kitchen project can do much more to mitigate environmental impacts,” particularly on water shortages and drought, he said.
Colwell said those concerns are unfounded and described the lithium extraction process as a “closed-loop system” that won’t generate landfill waste or air pollution.
“It is the cleanest lithium technology on the planet,” he said.
Jones ruled that the company has adequately addressed the project’s effects on water supply and couldn’t analyze potential future air quality impact.
Olmedo said the court ruling doesn’t satisfy the nonprofits’ concerns. They want stronger water conservation measures, better protections for tribal resources and more details about waste generation and water recycling. They’re seeking a legal agreement between the company and Imperial Valley residents to ensure those demands are satisfied.
Olmedo said his organization “will exhaust all available legal and public policy channels, including consideration of appealing the trial decision, to ensure that the residents and environment of the Imperial Valley receive the highest threshold of protection.”
Deborah Sullivan Brennan is the San Diego reporter for CalMatters, covering regional stories from a statewide angle. She writes about life, politics, the economy and environment in San Diego County. She... More by Deborah Brennan
We love that you want to share our stories with your readers. Hundreds of publications republish our work on a regular basis.
All of the articles at CalMatters are available to republish for free, under the following conditions:
Give prominent credit to our journalists: Credit our authors at the top of the article and any other byline areas of your publication. In the byline, we prefer “By Author Name, CalMatters.” If you’re republishing guest commentary (example) from CalMatters, in the byline, use “By Author Name, Special for CalMatters.”
Credit CalMatters at the top of the story: At the top of the story’s text, include this copy: “This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you are republishing commentary, include this copy instead: “This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.” If you’re republishing in print, omit the second sentence on newsletter signups.
Do not edit the article, including the headline,except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Alameda County” to “Alameda County, California” or “here.”
If you add reporting that would help localize the article, include this copy in your story: “Additional reporting by [Your Publication]” and let us know at republish@calmatters.org.
If you wish to translate the article, please contact us for approval at republish@calmatters.org.
Photos and illustrations by CalMatters staff or shown as “for CalMatters” may only be republished alongside the stories in which they originally appeared. For any other uses, please contact us for approval at visuals@calmatters.org.
Photos and illustrations from wire services like the Associated Press, Reuters, iStock are not free to republish.
Do not sell our stories, and do not sell ads specifically against our stories. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
Sharing a CalMatters story on social media? Please mention @CalMatters. We’re on X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and BlueSky.
If you’d like to regularly republish our stories, we have some other options available. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org if you’re interested.
Have other questions or special requests? Or do you have a great story to share about the impact of one of our stories on your audience? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at republish@calmatters.org.
Social and environmental groups claimed the project could cause water and air problems not disclosed in an environmental impact report.
CalMatters
California, explained
Deborah Brennan
Deborah Sullivan Brennan is the San Diego reporter for CalMatters, covering regional stories from a statewide angle. She writes about life, politics, the economy and environment in San Diego County. She covers topics ranging from border pollution to elections to higher education. Throughout her career, Deborah has covered government, environment and education for newspapers throughout Southern California.