The new Proposition 13: A $15 billion bond for school facilities

Photo illustration. Image via iStock

What it would do:

This Proposition 13 would authorize a $15 billion bond for school modernization and construction projects. Here’s how it would break down: $9 billion for K-12 schools ,and $2 billion each for community colleges and the state’s two public university systems, the California State University and University of California.

What it would cost taxpayers:

The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates it would cost the state about $740 million a year over the next 35 years to repay the costs of the bond, with interest. That’s a total estimated cost of $26 billion: the bond itself plus an added $11 billion in interest.

Why it’s on the ballot:

Lawmakers, Democrat and Republican, overwhelmingly voted to put this on the ballot, stressing California’s urgent need to modernize its facilities. Academics say that addressing a backlog of those needs would cost about $117 billion over the next decade. California voters approved a $9 billion school bond in 2016, but all that money has been accounted for and oversubscribed.

Arguments in favor:

One of the main selling points by advocates of the measure, including Gov. Gavin Newsom: This bond measure is structured differently from previous state bonds, focusing more on school modernization than new construction. Prop. 13, they say, will prioritize health and safety issues – such as mold and asbestos – and puts an end to the first-come, first-served application process that critics say has favored richer districts at the expense of needier ones.

Arguments against:

No organized campaign against the measure has yet surfaced. But opponents including the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association contend that Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislature should have spent the state’s $21 billion surplus to upgrade school facilities instead of “wasting our money on their own pet projects.” As a result, opponents note in ballot arguments, “Wasteful money pits in the vast education bureaucracy will grab much of this money” for “wasteful construction projects that benefit special interests.”

Latest in Election 2020

Voters including Dave Ade of San Jose, right, fill out their ballots on Nov. 6, 2018, at The Salvation Army in San Jose. Photo by Dai Sugano, Bay Area News Group

Election 2020

One upside of the coronavirus shutdown, maybe? Fewer voter initiatives

coronavirus pandemic respirator

Election 2020

Coronavirus pandemic is no time for partisan politics in Washington

Republican California primary results moderate 2020 top two

Election 2020

Republican tug-of-war: Election raises a familiar GOP dilemma in California

Mrs. Kilgore’s fifth and sixth grade classroom on December 13, 2019. Smart classrooms were one of the upgrades the school received when the building was rebuilt.

Election 2020

California’s Prop. 13 school bond is officially defeated

Electoral confusion in California's top-two primary. Image via iStock

Election 2020

In California primaries, sometimes the winning strategy is to help a foe

What do the top two spenders, Michael Bloomberg and Tom Steyer, have in common? Both are billionaires and both are no longer in the race.

Election 2020

Prez primary price: How much each candidate spent in California