In summary

California’s Catholic bishops want the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a state sex abuse law, setting up another conflict with the high court.

KEEP TABS ON THE LATEST CALIFORNIA POLICY AND POLITICS NEWS


CalMatters is dedicated to explaining how state government impacts our lives. Your support helps us produce journalism that makes a difference. Donate now.


Could California find itself in another conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court?

Nine California Catholic dioceses and archdioceses have asked the nation’s highest court to review their case against a 2019 law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, which created a three-year window for survivors of childhood sexual abuse to file legal claims against alleged perpetrators at school, church or elsewhere, regardless of when the alleged abuse occurred. The law also allowed defendants to be sued for a new offense: “cover up” activity.

In the April 15 petition, which was first reported last week by the Catholic News Agency, lawyers for the Catholic bishops assert the law is unconstitutional because California already gave victims a chance to sue in 2002 — when it opened a one-year portal for sex abuse survivors to file claims with no time limit attached — and because it retroactively adds new liabilities.

  • The lawyers wrote: “Review is critical now, before the Catholic Church in the largest State in the union is forced to litigate hundreds or thousands of cases seeking potentially billions of dollars in retroactive punitive damages under an unconstitutional double-revival regime.”
  • They added that their clients have already paid more than $1.2 billion to resolve claims filed during the original one-year window, and “to finance these settlements, they expended significant resources, sold vast swaths of Church property, and in some cases exhausted or relinquished insurance coverage for past and future abuse claims.”
  • The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests slammed the bishops’ petition: “The 2002 window lasted one year, barely enough time for victims to find their courage or their voices. Many only heard about the window or found their courage too late. This new three-year window is allowing survivors in a huge state the time to speak out, get help, and come forward. We believe it is that bravery that is scaring California’s Catholic bishops.”

Newsom’s office declined to comment: “We have nothing to add at this time,” Daniel Lopez, Newsom’s deputy communications director, told me in an email.

But the petition, which came came less than a month before Politico published a draft U.S. Supreme Court majority opinion showing justices are poised to overturn the federal constitutional right to an abortion, could spark the latest standoff between California and the high court.

In other reproductive justice news: Attorney General Rob Bonta announced Monday that Kings County District Attorney Keith Fagundes dropped criminal charges against Adora Perez, whom he had previously charged with manslaughter after she delivered a stillborn baby while high on methamphetamine. “California law is clear: We do not criminalize people for the loss of a pregnancy,” Bonta said.


A message from our Sponsor


The coronavirus bottom line: As of Thursday, California had 8,654,420 confirmed cases (+0.3% from previous day) and 89,851 deaths (+0.2% from previous day), according to state data now updated just twice a week on Tuesdays and Fridays. CalMatters is also tracking coronavirus hospitalizations by county.

California has administered 74,907,314 vaccine doses, and 75% of eligible Californians are fully vaccinated.


A message from our Sponsor


1. California election updates

Controller candidate Steve Glazer gives an interview at CalMatters’ offices in Sacramento on May 3, 2022. Photo by Martin do Nascimento, CalMatters

Early voting for California’s June 7 primary election is now underway, with Monday marking the last day for counties to begin sending mail-in ballots to every registered voter. Here’s a rundown of the latest election updates:

What Californians need to know to prepare to vote
Go to Voter Guide

2. Will CA require pay data to be public?

Illustration by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters; iStock

Imagine a future in which job postings resemble nutrition facts labels on food — but instead of measuring calories and sugar, the numbers represent the job’s pay range and benefits, as well as the company’s average pay broken down by gender and race, turnover rate and ratio of contractors to full-time employees. All of those metrics — and more — would become public knowledge under two workplace transparency bills that have cleared their first hurdles in the state Legislature despite fierce opposition from business groups who say they would lead to unfair comparisons and expensive lawsuits, CalMatters’ Grace Gedye reports.

But, if history is any guide, the two bills face an uphill battle — even in the Democrat-dominated Legislature. The Chamber of Commerce labeled both as “job killers” — a designation that often serves as the kiss of death. The latest casualty: a bill that would have forced employers to provide more transparency about their workplace surveillance and tracking tactics, though lawmakers are rushing to cobble together another worker privacy proposal.

3. Get ready for next stage of solar battle

Baker Electric workers place solar panels on the roof of a home in San Diego on Oct. 14, 2016. Photo by Mike Blake, Reuters

Remember state regulators’ controversial proposal to reform a wildly successful rooftop solar incentive program — one to which Newsom in January said “changes need to be made”? The California Public Utilities Commission had been slated to vote as early as Jan. 27 on its proposal to reduce the payments that homeowners receive for selling excess solar power back to utilities — and charge those homeowners an average monthly fee of $57. But after blowback from figures as high-ranking as Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the commission postponed its decision — and on Monday announced that it will be accepting comment from involved groups through June 10. The commission must respond to those comments by June 24. Members of the public can submit comments at any time here.

  • Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar & Storage Association: We’re glad the commission “recognized just how far out of step the first proposed decision was with California’s clean energy goals and equity values. … At the same time, we know utility special interests have a lot of power and a significant profit motive in stopping competition from rooftop solar.”
  • The commission’s original plan is backed by the state’s three largest investor-owned utilities: PG&E, Southern California Edison and Sempra Energy.
  • Recently released lobbyist disclosure reports illuminate the battle’s high stakes: Sempra Energy spent nearly $2 million lobbying the Capitol from Jan. 1 to March 31, more than any other lobbyist employer, according to a Capitol Morning Report analysis of Secretary of State records. In third place was PG&E at $1.25 million, followed closely by the California Solar & Storage Association at $1.1 million.

A message from our Sponsor


CalMatters commentary

CalMatters columnist Dan Walters: The conflict between California state government and many cities over housing quotas continues while construction lags behind need.

State leaders must pass a budget that boosts homeownership: Contact Newsom and your representatives to demand they earmark $600 million to develop deed-restricted ownership housing and bolster down-payment assistance programs, argues Otto Catrina, president of the California Association of Realtors.


A message from our Sponsor


Other things worth your time

Southern California housing plans contain ‘fake sites,’ lack analysis, critics say. // Daily News

John Muir’s legacy is on the ballot in this East Bay city where voters will choose between housing and open space. // San Francisco Chronicle

How many people are homeless in San Francisco? Data reveals worsening crisis. // San Francisco Chronicle

Why the City of Industry’s $20 million solar project collapsed like a house of cards. // Orange County Register

Economic shocks yet to strike Bay Area home prices. // Mercury News

California wants to be a sanctuary for abortion rights. But in the Central Valley, care is harder to reach. // PBS NewsHour

Election 2022: This San Fernando Valley state senate district is poised for a fresh face. // Daily News

CalPERS board violated open meetings law, judge rules. // Sacramento Bee

3 convicted in $20M California drug treatment fraud scheme. // Associated Press

Dave Chapelle wants Gascón to file felony charges over stage attack, lawyer says. // Rolling Stone

Oakley police chief was fired for alleged sexual harassment, ‘dishonesty’ with investigators. // Mercury News

Black Lives Matter’s Patrisse Cullors denies wrongdoing. // Associated Press

More CSU sexual harassment and abuse cases made public. // EdSource

Poll: Californians say UC and CSU tuition is unaffordable and 4-year degree isn’t the only way to succeed. // Los Angeles Times

Why hasn’t UC Berkeley built more student housing? // Berkeleyside

Bay Area schools see families leave cities, flock to suburbs. // EdSource

California targets loud exhaust with sound-activated camera enforcement. // Autoweek

The fight for clean energy pits San Francisco against the river rafting industry. // San Francisco Examiner

Giant sequoia forest changes after California wildfires in Sierra. // Sacramento Bee

California’s two largest reservoirs are already at ‘critically low levels’ and the dry season is just starting. // CNN

New bill aims to limit frenzy of California well drilling. // Los Angeles Times

Benicia orders residents, businesses to immediately cut water use by 30% after pipeline break. // San Francisco Chronicle

Central Valley could be test ground for new mosquito control. // Kaiser Health News

California COVID-19 deaths near 90,000, but the per-capita rate is among lowest in U.S. // Los Angeles Times


See you tomorrow.

Tips, insight or feedback? Email emily@calmatters.org.

Follow me on Twitter: @emily_hoeven

Subscribe to CalMatters newsletters here.

Follow CalMatters on Facebook and Twitter.

CalMatters is now available in Spanish on TwitterFacebook and RSS.


We want to hear from you

Want to submit a guest commentary or reaction to an article we wrote? You can find our submission guidelines here. Please contact CalMatters with any commentary questions: commentary@calmatters.org

Emily Hoeven writes the daily WhatMatters newsletter for CalMatters. Her reporting, essays, and opinion columns have been published in San Francisco Weekly, the Deseret News, the San Francisco Business...