Proposition 41
Require audits of new tax programs
This proposition would make it harder to pass new special taxes by requiring the state auditor to review any special tax proposal before it goes to voters. The auditor would assess whether the program that would receive funding could cut spending by at least 10% annually. Any new special tax approved by voters would count toward California’s spending limit, potentially triggering automatic refunds that reduce funding for other state programs. If this proposition receives more votes than Proposition 40 (a wealth tax on billionaires), Proposition 40 is nullified, even if Proposition 40 also passes.
Weigh the arguments.
Take our quizzes to learn more about each proposition.
Summary
Support
Supporters say key social programs are not getting enough funding despite California’s high taxes. They argue the state auditor should assess whether the programs that would benefit from special taxes are spending money wisely. Supporters also want these special taxes to count toward the state spending limit, making tax rebates to Californians more likely.
Oppose
The chief opponent is SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, the sponsor of Proposition 40. The union argues that Prop. 41 is designed to trick voters into unknowingly blocking a wealth tax on billionaires. Prop. 41 isn’t about auditing waste in public programs, the union says; instead it’s a way for billionaires to avoid paying taxes once on their huge wealth.
People and organizations
Support
- Reform California
- Google co-founder Sergey Brin
- Chairman and CEO of Wonderful Company foods Stewart Resnick
Oppose
- SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West
- California Democratic Party
Commentary
Campaign finance
Proposition committees raise money to support or oppose propositions. Outside groups can also raise and spend money independently to influence outcomes.
- Proposition committees
- Outside spending
- Difference to other side
Support
Oppose
Proposition committees
These committees are primarily formed to campaign for or against a proposition. They must identify donors who give $100 or more. There are no limits on how much donors can give. Below, we exclude donors whose contributions total less than $100.
Support
Oppose
Outside spending
Separate from proposition committees, outside groups can pay for ads, mailers and other efforts to influence voters. They can’t coordinate that spending with proposition committees. There is no limit on how much they can spend.
Support
Oppose
Ballot text
PROHIBITS NEW STATE TAXES THАТ EXСLUDE REVENUES FROM STATE SPENDING LIMIT. REQUIRES AUDITS FOR NEW STATE SPECIAL TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Nullifies state taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that exempt their revenues from voter-approved state spending limit. Requires pre-election and recurring audits of programs funded by new special taxes. Fiscal Impact: The net fiscal effect is unknown as it depends on future decisions by voters, the Legislature, and other policymakers.
Source: California Secretary of State
